Ibragim Todashev

While this story is over a week old now, new "evidence" is coming out damning the federal agents in what was already a pretty disturbing and detrimental investigation on their part.  To keep the story simple, a friend of the elder of the suspected Boston Bombers, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was interviewed by FBI agents on May 22nd.  They proceeded to shoot the man in the head 7 times during the interview for unspecified reasons.  Multiple excuses came out claiming he attempted to attack the agent, that he had a knife, that he was intimidating etc etc etc.  Of course the real story is being leaked out slowly but surely by other officers on the scene.  According to InfoWars: 

“We have confirmed through senior sources within the FBI that Ibragim was indeed unarmed when he was shot seven times in the head, what appear to be even in the back of the head,” Hassan Shibly, executive director of the CAIR Florida, told USA Today. “That’s very disturbing.”

Getting in to the back story they also report:

Ibragim Todashev was an acquaintance of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the alleged terrorist who was killed in Watertown, Massachusetts, following the Boston Marathon bombing. On May 22, we reported that Todashev was killed by the FBI during interrogation in Florida.

Khusn Taramiv, a friend of Todashev, told WESH-TV in Orlando that Todashev felt he would be shot by the FBI. “He felt inside he was going to get shot,” Taramiv said. “I told him, ‘Everything is going to be fine, don’t worry about it.’ He said, ‘I have a really bad feeling.”

The FBI initially claimed its agents had killed Todashev in self defense during questioning. On Wednesday, however, the agency said the Chechen was unarmed.

“Law enforcement officials said Todashev was in the process of confessing to a 2011 triple murder in Waltham, Mass., and was working on writing out the details of the crime when he snapped and turned violent,” WESH.com reported. “Officials said Todashev pushed a table and possibly threw a chair.”

So because this guy supposedly pushed a table and threw a chair he got shot 7 times.  The multiple officers on scene were not able to, I don't know, subdue him?  He had no weapons and was surrounding by men with guns yet he thought it was in his best interest to attack them?  First off, this story smells fishier each time I read about it, while he definitely had no weapons I doubt he even threw a table or chair. Secondly, the likely hood of him being in the process of admitting to a triple homicide when this murder occurred are VERY slim.  Yet in this new America, after a guy is killed or maimed to the point  not being able to speak, the federal government can then reveal that they admitted to crimes with the public just nodding and agreeing. 

Dzhokhar Tamerlan did not write a admission of guilt inside of the boat he was bleeding to death in.  He also did not write anything of the sort while in custody.  Yet the government claims he did, and for all intensive purposes he might as well have.  The same goes for Ibragim, while he most likely never admitted to anything, since he is dead now the government will tell the story as they please.  So instead of admitting they murdered an unarmed man they spin the tale to give an impression that this man was evil.  He admitted to the murder of three people before the feds killed him, so don't worry he was a bad guy!  Ugh.

Chechen lawyer Zaurbek Sadakhanov characterized the killing an extrajudicial execution. “Why was he interrogated three times without a lawyer? Why no recording? Why seven shots? And why should I believe their version? Why do American policemen believe they can do whatever they want?”